Media

The U.S. “Gold Card” has quickly drawn attention with the release of an official application form, website, and filing address. While this suggests the program is moving forward, there are still important legal and practical questions to consider, especially when comparing it to the well-established EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program.

A Program Built by Executive Order

One of the most important points for investors to understand is that the Gold Card was created by executive order, not by legislation passed by Congress. Unlike EB-5, it is not supported by a detailed statute or formal regulations. This means the program could be challenged in federal court or modified, which in all likelihood it will. Or even eliminated, by a future administration without the need for new legislation. EB-5, on the other hand, is firmly grounded in U.S. immigration law and regulations, offering a higher level of long-term certainty and security for investors.

Processing Promises vs Visa Availability

The current U.S. administration has suggested that Gold Card applications will be processed quickly. However, processing speed is only one part of the picture. It is also important to consider visa availability and which immigrant visa categories Gold Card applications will draw from, as this directly affects overall wait times.

Gold Card applications fall under the EB-1 or EB-2 categories, both of which are already subject to visa backlogs, particularly for China and India. These already retrogressed nations and are likely to face increased demand as Gold Card filings begin. For example, EB-2 applicants from China already face wait times measured in several years, while EB-2 applicants from India face wait times stretching into multiple decades. Even EB-1, which is typically faster, is currently backlogged for both China and India and could see further delays as Gold Card applicants are added to these categories.

By contrast, EB-5 investments in Rural or High Unemployment (TEA) projects are currently current for all nationalities, making EB-5 a more predictable option for many investors, despite longer adjudication timelines.

A Key Difference for Families

With EB-5, one qualifying investment covers the main applicant, their spouse, and unmarried children under 21. Under the Gold Card, each dependent could make a separate $1 million donation to the U.S. government, which significantly increases the cost for families. Guidance on this matter is yet unclear.

Adjustment of Status: Still Unclear

Another open question is whether Gold Card applicants will be allowed to file for adjustment of status while in the United States. Language in the application form suggests applicants may be limited to consular processing, which could restrict their ability to stay, work, or travel while their application is pending.

EB-5 investors, by comparison, are clearly permitted to file concurrent adjustment applications when eligible.

EB-5 vs Gold Card: Key Takeaways

• EB-5: $800,000 at-risk investment, potential return, family included, no current TEA visa backlog, governed by statute
• Gold Card: $1 million donation per person, no return of funds, likely visa backlogs, no statute or regulations, subject to executive action

While the Gold Card may be attractive to some ultra-high-net-worth individuals, it comes with higher costs, legal uncertainty, and possible visa delays. For many investors, particularly families and those from backlogged countries, EB-5 continues to offer the most stable, well-structured, and predictable investment-based path to U.S. permanent residence. What would make better sense is to wait to see if new applicants are treated fairly and processed swiftly. In the interim, why roll the dice when the EB-5 program is rooted in law, active for nearly 35 years, and families from around the world have shown success in obtaining their access to America.